Bencher Voter Guide

Kyle Kawanami, KC

District
Edmonton
Organization
Emery Jamieson LLP
Location
Edmonton
Call year
2007
Read Candidate CV Election profile Other (not available yet) Other (not available yet)

Perspectives

Summaries interpret each candidate's statements. They aren't the candidates' own words and haven't been endorsed by them. How perspectives are summarized

Not addressed in their statement: Candidates wrote their statements for the Law Society's election site, not in answer to these topics. A statement that doesn't address a topic says nothing about the candidate's views or experience on it.

AI

AI and the Practice of Law

Recognizes that emerging technologies may be very useful but says they must be carefully monitored. AI is not explicitly named.

Addressed
  • Broader technology adoption and oversight
Evidence and limits

Addressed · Policy principle. A relevant principle, priority, issue recognition or reported practice is directly expressed. This does not necessarily mean a specific policy change is proposed.

The legal profession faces constant challenges, both from societal factors as well as from new emerging technologies.  While these technologies may be incredibly useful, they must be carefully monitored.

The candidate expresses a benefit-and-oversight principle for emerging technology.

What this doesn't show

  • The statement does not identify a monitoring mechanism or an AI-specific rule.
Compare on AI

A2J

Access to Justice through Allied Professionals

Not addressed in their statement.

Compare on A2J

Candidate statements

Election statement

As published on the candidate's Law Society of Alberta election profile.

Candidates are encouraged to grant this site permission to reproduce their statement here

Supplemental statement

Candidates are encouraged to send this site a supplemental statement to add to, clarify or update their election statement

Please note:

This site is not affiliated with the Law Society of Alberta and is not endorsed by the Law Society or by any candidate.

The role of a Bencher is not to represent or advocate for particular interests, constituencies, or causes, but to exercise independent judgment in carrying out the Law Society’s public-interest mandate.

It is not the intent or objective of this site to suggest that candidates are making representations or promises about how they would approach a given topic as an elected Bencher. Our intent is to invite them to speak to their experience, interest and perspective as it relates to topics on which they may reasonably be expected to engage as an elected Bencher, as that may or may not reflect specific competencies in those areas.