Bencher Voter Guide

Adam Drew, KC

District
Calgary
Organization
Alberta Crown Prosecution Service
Location
Calgary
Call year
2007

Perspectives

Summaries interpret each candidate's statements. They aren't the candidates' own words and haven't been endorsed by them. How perspectives are summarized

Not addressed in their statement: Candidates wrote their statements for the Law Society's election site, not in answer to these topics. A statement that doesn't address a topic says nothing about the candidate's views or experience on it.

AI

AI and the Practice of Law

Not addressed in their statement.

Compare on AI

Regulatory Burden

Regulatory Burden on Solo and Small Firm

Speaks to fair, timely, transparent and proportionate conduct processes, together with guidance, training and practical resources that help members meet professional responsibilities. Relevance to smaller practices is inferred.

Inferred
  • Proportionate regulation
  • Compliance guidance and support
Evidence and limits

Inferred · Policy principle, Inferred relevance. A narrow, reasonable interpretation or topic connection that is not directly stated. Read the reasoning and limitations.

My experience in conduct and competence with the Society, alongside adjudicator training, has reinforced the importance of processes that are fair, timely, transparent, and proportionate. This promotes public protection, confidence in the profession, and fair treatment of lawyers.
My work at the Society has given me insight into how training, mentorship, and practical resources support lawyers and students-at-law in developing core skills and meeting their professional responsibilities.

Proportionate process and help meeting obligations are explicit. Their application to solo or small-firm burden is inferred because the statement discusses members generally.

What this doesn't show

  • No firm-size distinction, reduced fee or removed safeguard is stated.
Compare on Regulatory Burden

Pathways

Pathways to the Profession

Emphasizes mentorship, ethics, practical skills and accessible support for articling students and junior lawyers to develop competence and meet professional responsibilities.

Addressed
  • Practical training and qualification
  • Early career support
  • Entry standards and accountability
Evidence and limits

Addressed · Policy principle. A relevant principle, priority, issue recognition or reported practice is directly expressed. This does not necessarily mean a specific policy change is proposed.

That work has also deepened my understanding of the importance of mentorship, ethics, and practical skill development for articling students and junior lawyers.
My work at the Society has given me insight into how training, mentorship, and practical resources support lawyers and students-at-law in developing core skills and meeting their professional responsibilities.

The statement expressly values practical training and support at the articling and early-career stages.

What this doesn't show

  • No particular alternative qualification route, admissions reform or expanded institution is proposed.
Compare on Pathways

A2J

Access to Justice through Allied Professionals

Not addressed in their statement.

Compare on A2J

Candidate statements

Election statement

As published on the candidate's Law Society of Alberta election profile.

Candidates are encouraged to grant this site permission to reproduce their statement here

Supplemental statement

Candidates are encouraged to send this site a supplemental statement to add to, clarify or update their election statement

Please note:

This site is not affiliated with the Law Society of Alberta and is not endorsed by the Law Society or by any candidate.

The role of a Bencher is not to represent or advocate for particular interests, constituencies, or causes, but to exercise independent judgment in carrying out the Law Society’s public-interest mandate.

It is not the intent or objective of this site to suggest that candidates are making representations or promises about how they would approach a given topic as an elected Bencher. Our intent is to invite them to speak to their experience, interest and perspective as it relates to topics on which they may reasonably be expected to engage as an elected Bencher, as that may or may not reflect specific competencies in those areas.